On this page
Education Hub / SQE2 / Practice Areas/

Occupiers’ Liability

Topic

Occupiers' Liability in Tort Law

Occupiers' liability refers to the legal responsibility of those who control premises (the occupiers) to ensure the safety of visitors. This area of tort law governs the duty of care owed by occupiers to different categories of entrants, including lawful visitors, trespassers, and licensees. The primary statutes in this area are the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 and the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984, which outline the standards of care required and the circumstances under which occupiers can be held liable for injuries sustained on their property.

Occupiers' Liability Act 1957

The Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 sets out the duty of care owed by occupiers to lawful visitors:

  • ★ Lawful Visitors: The Act applies to those who enter premises with the occupier's express or implied permission, including invitees and licensees.
  • ★ Common Duty of Care: Occupiers owe a common duty of care to ensure that visitors are reasonably safe while using the premises for the purposes for which they are invited or permitted to be there. This includes maintaining the premises and addressing any potential hazards.
  • ★ Standard of Care: The standard of care is that of a reasonable occupier, taking into account the nature of the premises, the type of visitor, and the circumstances. Greater care may be required for vulnerable individuals, such as children.
  • ★ Warnings and Notices: Occupiers can discharge their duty by providing adequate warnings of dangers, although mere warning may not be sufficient if the risk remains significant.

Occupiers' Liability Act 1984

The Occupiers' Liability Act 1984 extends the duty of care to certain categories of trespassers and uninvited persons:

  • ★ Trespassers: The Act recognizes a duty of care towards trespassers, particularly in situations where the occupier is aware of the danger and the potential for trespassers to encounter it.
  • ★ Duty of Common Humanity: The duty is to take reasonable steps to prevent injury to trespassers from dangers of which the occupier is aware. This duty is less onerous than that owed to lawful visitors but still requires occupiers to avoid causing harm recklessly or with gross negligence.
  • ★ Objective Criteria: The duty applies when the occupier knows or has reasonable grounds to believe that a danger exists, and that trespassers are likely to come into the vicinity of the danger. The occupier must also have reasonable grounds to believe that the risk is one against which protection should be provided.

Factors Affecting Liability

Several factors can influence the extent of an occupier's liability, including:

  • ★ Type of Visitor: The standard of care may vary depending on whether the visitor is an invitee, licensee, or trespasser. Children, for example, may require a higher standard of care due to their vulnerability.
  • ★ Nature of the Premises: The occupier's duty may vary with the type of premises, such as a private home, business, or public space. The expected level of safety may differ depending on the environment and use of the property.
  • ★ Warnings and Notices: The provision of warnings and notices about potential dangers can affect liability. Adequate and clear warnings may discharge the duty of care, but they must be effective in preventing harm.
  • ★ Reasonable Measures: The occupier must take reasonable measures to address known dangers. This includes regular maintenance, repairs, and appropriate security measures to prevent unauthorized access.

Case Law

Wheat v Lacon & Co Ltd (1966)

This case clarified that an occupier is someone who has a sufficient degree of control over premises. The court held that both the brewery and the tenant in charge of a pub were occupiers, as both had control over the property and were responsible for the safety of visitors.

Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council (2003)

In this case, the House of Lords held that an occupier is not required to warn or protect visitors against obvious risks. A claimant injured while diving into a shallow lake at a country park was not entitled to compensation, as the danger was obvious and the claimant had chosen to engage in the risky activity.

Examples

Example 1 - Liability for Injuries on Business Premises

Scenario:

A customer slips and falls on a wet floor in a supermarket. The store had not placed any warning signs after mopping. The supermarket may be liable under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 for failing to take reasonable care to ensure the customer's safety.

Example 2 - Liability for Trespassers

Scenario:

A child trespasses onto a construction site and is injured. If the occupier was aware of the likelihood of children trespassing and failed to secure the site or provide adequate warnings, they may be liable under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984.

Conclusion

Principles of vicarious liability Legal requirements for a claim under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 (in relation to visitors) and the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984 (in relation to non-visitors)
27

53

SQE2

Specification

Explore