On this page
Education Hub / SQE2 / Practice Areas/

Mistake

Topic

Mistake in Contract Law

A mistake in contract law occurs when one or both parties have an incorrect understanding or belief about a fact related to the contract. Mistakes can affect the validity of a contract and may render it void or voidable. The law recognizes several types of mistakes, each with different implications for the enforceability of the contract. The key types include common mistake, mutual mistake, and unilateral mistake.

Types of Mistake

Mistakes are generally classified into three main categories:

  • ★ Common Mistake: Occurs when both parties share the same erroneous belief about a fundamental fact at the time the contract is made. If the mistake is so fundamental that it undermines the contract's purpose, the contract may be considered void.
  • ★ Mutual Mistake: Arises when both parties are mistaken about different facts or misunderstand each other, resulting in a lack of consensus ad idem (meeting of the minds). This can lead to the contract being voidable if the mistake is about a material fact.
  • ★ Unilateral Mistake: Occurs when only one party is mistaken about a fundamental aspect of the contract, and the other party is aware or ought to be aware of the mistake. This can render the contract voidable, especially if the mistake concerns the identity of a party or the nature of the contract.

The legal consequences of a mistake depend on its type and the circumstances surrounding it:

  • ★ Common Mistake: If the common mistake is about a fundamental aspect, such as the existence of the subject matter, the contract may be void ab initio (from the beginning). The principle established in Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd (1932) suggests that the mistake must render the contract essentially different from what was agreed upon.
  • ★ Mutual Mistake: The contract may be voidable if the mutual mistake prevents the formation of a consensus. The court may rescind the contract and restore the parties to their pre-contractual positions, provided it is equitable to do so.
  • ★ Unilateral Mistake: The contract may be voidable if the mistaken party can show that the mistake was fundamental and the other party knew or should have known about it. Remedies may include rescission, but not typically damages, unless there is an element of misrepresentation or deceit.

Case Law

Common Mistake - Couturier v Hastie (1856)

In this case, a contract was made for the sale of corn, which was assumed to be in transit. Unknown to both parties, the corn had already perished before the contract was formed. The court held that there was a common mistake about the existence of the subject matter, rendering the contract void.

Mutual Mistake - Raffles v Wichelhaus (1864)

This case involved a mutual mistake about the ship named "Peerless" on which goods were to be delivered. There were two ships with the same name, leading to a misunderstanding about which ship was meant. The court ruled that there was no binding contract due to the lack of a meeting of the minds.

Unilateral Mistake - Cundy v Lindsay (1878)

In this case, the plaintiff was induced to enter into a contract by a party pretending to be a reputable company. The court held that there was a unilateral mistake regarding the identity of the contracting party, and as such, the contract was void.

Examples

Example 1 - Common Mistake

Scenario:

Two parties agree to sell and purchase a piece of land, believing it to be undeveloped. After the contract is formed, they discover that the land is, in fact, developed and contains a building. This common mistake about the nature of the land may render the contract void if the existence of the building fundamentally changes the nature of the agreement.

Example 2 - Unilateral Mistake

Scenario:

A seller agrees to sell a vintage car, believing it to be a replica, at a significantly lower price. The buyer, who knows it is an original and much more valuable, does not correct the seller's mistake. Upon discovering the car's true value, the seller may argue that the contract is voidable due to a unilateral mistake regarding the car's value.

Conclusion

Mistakes in contract law can significantly impact the enforceability of contracts. Whether a mistake is common, mutual, or unilateral, the consequences can range from rendering the contract void to making it voidable. The specific legal remedies depend on the nature of the mistake and the circumstances surrounding it. Understanding these distinctions helps parties navigate contractual disputes and determine the appropriate legal outcomes.

Misrepresentation Unfair contract terms
27

53

SQE2

Specification

Explore