On this page
Education Hub / SQE2 / Practice Areas/

Liquidated sums and penalties

Topic

Liquidated Sums and Penalties in Contract Law

Liquidated sums and penalties are terms used in contracts to specify the consequences of a breach. A liquidated sum is a predetermined amount agreed upon by the parties, reflecting a genuine pre-estimate of loss. In contrast, a penalty is designed to deter breach by imposing an excessive or punitive charge. The enforceability of these provisions depends on whether they are deemed a genuine pre-estimate of loss or a penalty.

Liquidated Sums

Liquidated sums are agreed upon amounts stipulated in a contract, intended to cover anticipated damages in the event of a breach:

  • ★ Genuine Pre-Estimate of Loss: The sum must be a reasonable forecast of the likely damages resulting from a breach, not intended to punish the breaching party.
  • ★ Enforceability: Courts generally uphold liquidated damages clauses if they are a genuine pre-estimate of the loss, providing a straightforward means of compensation without the need for further litigation.

Penalties

Penalties, unlike liquidated sums, are not enforceable if they are intended to punish rather than compensate:

  • ★ Excessive or Punitive Nature: A penalty clause imposes an unreasonably high amount that exceeds the actual harm or loss suffered, serving as a deterrent rather than compensation.
  • ★ Unenforceability: Courts do not enforce penalty clauses, as they are considered contrary to public policy. Instead, they may award damages based on actual loss, regardless of the contract's stipulated amount.

Key Considerations for Distinction

Determining whether a clause is a liquidated sum or penalty involves several key considerations:

  • ★ Timing of Assessment: The nature of the sum is assessed based on the information available at the time of contract formation, not at the time of breach.
  • ★ Proportionality: The stipulated amount must be proportionate to the anticipated loss; otherwise, it is likely to be deemed a penalty.
  • ★ Language Used: The label given by the parties, such as "penalty" or "liquidated damages," is not decisive; the substance and intention behind the clause are what matter.

Case Law

Liquidated Damages - Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd (1915)

In this landmark case, the House of Lords laid down criteria for distinguishing between liquidated damages and penalties. The court upheld the liquidated damages clause, as it was a genuine pre-estimate of loss rather than a penalty.

Penalty - Cavendish Square Holding BV v Makdessi (2015)

The Supreme Court clarified the modern test for penalties, emphasizing that a penalty clause is unenforceable if it imposes a detriment out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party in the enforcement of the primary obligation.

Examples

Example 1 - Enforceable Liquidated Damages

Scenario:

A software development contract includes a clause stating a daily rate for late delivery, calculated based on expected lost profits. This clause is likely enforceable as a liquidated damages clause since it reasonably estimates the potential loss.

Example 2 - Unenforceable Penalty

Scenario:

A lease agreement stipulates that late payment of rent will incur a fine equivalent to three times the monthly rent. This excessive charge is likely considered a penalty and thus unenforceable, as it does not reflect a genuine pre-estimate of loss.

Conclusion

Liquidated sums and penalties serve different purposes in contracts. While liquidated sums provide a practical and enforceable means to pre-estimate damages, penalties are generally unenforceable as they aim to punish rather than compensate. Understanding these distinctions helps ensure that contractual terms are fair and legally binding, providing clear guidance on the consequences of a breach.

Damages Specific performance
27

53

SQE2

Specification

Explore