Education Hub / SQE2 / Practice Areas/

Employers’ primary liability (operation and effect of the common law principles)

Topic

Employers’ Primary Liability in Tort Law

Employers' primary liability refers to the direct responsibility employers have under common law to ensure the safety and well-being of their employees. This duty of care encompasses providing a safe working environment, adequate training, proper equipment, and a safe system of work. When employers fail to meet these standards, they may be held liable for injuries or damages suffered by employees as a result of their negligence.

Common Law Duty of Care

Under common law, employers owe a duty of care to their employees, which includes several key responsibilities:

  • Provision of Safe Equipment: Employers must provide and maintain safe machinery, tools, and equipment. This includes regular inspections and maintenance to prevent malfunctions that could cause harm.
  • Safe System of Work: Employers are required to establish and enforce safe work practices and procedures. This includes planning work tasks in a way that minimizes risk and ensuring that employees adhere to safety protocols.
  • Competent Staff and Supervision: Employers must hire competent staff and provide adequate supervision. This duty involves ensuring that employees are properly trained and capable of performing their tasks safely.
  • Safe Working Environment: Employers are responsible for maintaining a safe physical workplace, free from hazards such as unsafe structures, toxic substances, and other dangers.

Breach of Duty and Liability

Employers can be held liable for breaches of their duty of care, leading to compensation claims for injuries or losses suffered by employees:

  • Negligence Standard: Employers are judged by the standard of what a reasonable employer would have done under similar circumstances. A breach occurs if the employer's actions or omissions fall below this standard.
  • Direct Causation: Employees must prove that the breach of duty directly caused their injury or loss. This involves establishing that the harm would not have occurred but for the employer's negligence.
  • Foreseeable Harm: The type of harm suffered must have been a foreseeable result of the employer's actions or inactions. Employers are not liable for unforeseeable consequences.

Defenses to Employers' Liability

Employers may raise several defenses to limit or avoid liability, including:

  • Contributory Negligence: If the employee contributed to their own injury through careless actions, the damages awarded may be reduced proportionally. This defense acknowledges shared responsibility.
  • Volenti Non Fit Injuria: This defense applies if the employee voluntarily accepted the risk of harm, knowing the dangers involved. This is often difficult to prove and is not applicable in most workplace injury cases.
  • Statutory Compliance: Employers may argue that they complied with all relevant health and safety legislation and standards, demonstrating that they took reasonable steps to ensure a safe working environment.

Case Law

Safe System of Work - Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co Ltd v English (1938)

This case established that employers are responsible for ensuring a safe system of work. The House of Lords held the employer liable for an employee's injury, emphasizing the duty to provide proper training, equipment, and supervision.

Provision of Safe Equipment - Smith v Baker & Sons (1891)

In this case, the court found the employer liable for failing to provide safe machinery, resulting in injury to the employee. The case highlighted the employer's duty to protect employees from foreseeable risks associated with work equipment.

Examples

Example 1 - Breach of Duty in Construction

Scenario:

A construction company fails to secure scaffolding properly, resulting in a collapse that injures several workers. The company may be liable for failing to provide a safe working environment and equipment, breaching their duty of care.

Example 2 - Inadequate Training in Manufacturing

Scenario:

An employee in a manufacturing plant is injured due to improper handling of hazardous materials, stemming from inadequate training. The employer may be liable for failing to provide competent staff and proper supervision, breaching their duty of care.

Conclusion

Employers' primary liability under common law principles ensures that employers maintain a safe and secure workplace. By enforcing a duty of care, the law protects employees from avoidable harm and provides recourse for those injured due to employer negligence. Understanding these responsibilities and the potential defenses available helps employers navigate their legal obligations and fosters safer working environments.

SQE2

Specification

Explore