On this page
Education Hub / SQE2 / Practice Areas/

Defences

Topic

Defences in Tort Law

Defences in tort law are legal arguments used by defendants to reduce or eliminate their liability for a tortious act. These defences can either mitigate the amount of damages awarded or completely absolve the defendant from liability. Key defences include contributory negligence, consent (volenti non fit injuria), and statutory compliance. Each defence operates under specific conditions and must be proven by the defendant to be effective.

Contributory Negligence

Contributory negligence occurs when the claimant is partly responsible for their own harm. This defence can reduce the damages awarded proportionally to the claimant's degree of fault:

  • ★ Partial Defence: Contributory negligence does not absolve the defendant of liability but reduces the compensation by the percentage of fault attributable to the claimant.
  • ★ Standard of Care: The claimant must have failed to take reasonable care for their own safety, which contributed to the harm suffered. The reduction in damages reflects the extent to which the claimant's actions increased the risk of harm.
  • ★ Assessment: The court assesses the comparative responsibility of both parties, determining a fair apportionment of damages based on the claimant's contribution to the harm.

The defence of consent, or volenti non fit injuria, applies when the claimant voluntarily assumes the risk of harm, fully understanding the potential consequences:

  • ★ Voluntary Assumption: The claimant must have voluntarily and knowingly assumed the risk. This involves both awareness of the risk and an acceptance of it, often requiring clear evidence of agreement.
  • ★ Full Knowledge: The claimant must have full knowledge of the nature and extent of the risk. The defence fails if the claimant was unaware of the specific danger or its potential consequences.
  • ★ Application: This defence is commonly used in cases involving dangerous sports or activities, where participants implicitly accept the inherent risks involved.

Statutory Compliance

Statutory compliance can serve as a defence if the defendant can prove they adhered to all relevant laws and regulations at the time of the incident:

  • ★ Legal Requirements: The defendant must demonstrate that they complied with all statutory requirements and standards relevant to the case. This compliance suggests that reasonable care was exercised.
  • ★ Limitations: Statutory compliance does not provide a complete defence if the duty of care owed extends beyond the statutory obligations. The defendant must still meet the common law standard of reasonable care.
  • ★ Example: Employers complying with health and safety regulations may use this defence in workplace injury claims, provided their actions align with the law and do not exceed the required standards.

Case Law

Contributory Negligence - Froom v Butcher (1976)

In this case, the claimant's damages were reduced because they failed to wear a seatbelt, contributing to the severity of the injuries sustained in a car accident. The court held that contributory negligence was applicable, reducing the damages by a percentage reflecting the claimant's fault.

Consent - Morris v Murray (1990)

This case involved a claimant who willingly accepted a ride with an intoxicated pilot and was injured when the plane crashed. The court found that the claimant had accepted the risk, applying the volenti non fit injuria defence, and dismissed the claim.

Examples

Example 1 - Contributory Negligence in a Slip and Fall Case

Scenario:

A customer slips on a wet floor in a store but was running and not paying attention to the floor signs indicating the hazard. The store may argue contributory negligence, potentially reducing the damages awarded due to the customer's lack of caution.

Example 2 - Statutory Compliance in Product Liability

Scenario:

A manufacturer faces a lawsuit over an alleged defect in a product. The manufacturer can argue that the product met all regulatory safety standards and that any harm resulted from misuse by the consumer, not from a failure to comply with statutory requirements.

Conclusion

Defences in tort law provide a critical means for defendants to limit or negate liability for alleged wrongdoings. By asserting contributory negligence, consent, statutory compliance, or other relevant defences, defendants can mitigate the impact of claims against them. These defences ensure that liability is fairly allocated and that parties are not unjustly held accountable for unforeseeable or uncontrollable outcomes. Understanding these defences is essential for effectively navigating tort litigation and achieving just outcomes.

Employers’ primary liability (operation and effect of the common law principles) Volenti non fit injuria
27

53

SQE2

Specification

Explore