On this page
Education Hub / SQE2 / Practice Areas/

Costs management and budgeting

Topic

Costs Management and Budgeting

Costs management and budgeting are essential aspects of civil litigation, designed to control and predict the costs incurred during legal proceedings. These processes aim to ensure that legal costs remain reasonable and proportionate to the matters in dispute, promoting efficiency and transparency. Under the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), courts have the authority to manage the costs of litigation actively, requiring parties to submit budgets and ensuring that costs are controlled throughout the case.

Purpose of Costs Management and Budgeting

Costs management and budgeting serve several critical purposes in civil litigation:

  • ★ Predictability of Costs: By requiring parties to submit costs budgets, the court and the parties can gain a clear understanding of the likely costs of the litigation, helping to avoid unexpected expenses.
  • ★ Control of Costs: Costs management helps to prevent excessive spending by ensuring that the costs incurred are necessary and proportionate to the value and complexity of the case.
  • ★ Transparency: The process provides transparency, allowing the parties to see each other's estimated costs and make informed decisions about proceeding with the litigation or settling the case.
  • ★ Encouragement of Efficient Litigation: The oversight of costs encourages parties to litigate efficiently and avoid unnecessary procedural steps that could increase costs.

The Costs Management Process

The costs management process involves several key steps, typically under the guidance of the court:

  • ★ Preparation and Submission of Costs Budgets: Each party must prepare a detailed costs budget, outlining the estimated legal fees and disbursements for each stage of the proceedings. This budget includes costs already incurred and anticipated future costs.
  • ★ Costs Management Conference (CMC): A CMC is a hearing where the court reviews the submitted costs budgets. The judge assesses the budgets' reasonableness and proportionality, considering the case's complexity, the issues at stake, and the amounts in dispute.
  • ★ Costs Management Order (CMO): Following the CMC, the court issues a CMO, approving or modifying the submitted budgets. The CMO sets out the approved budgeted costs for each party, which acts as a cap on recoverable costs, unless there is a good reason to depart from the budget.
  • ★ Ongoing Monitoring and Adjustment: As the case progresses, the parties may need to update their costs budgets to reflect changes in the case's scope or unforeseen developments. Any substantial changes to the budget must be approved by the court.

Example - Costs Management in a Civil Case

Scenario:

In a commercial dispute involving a £200,000 claim, both parties prepare and submit detailed costs budgets, estimating the costs of legal representation, expert witnesses, and other expenses. The budgets include stages such as pre-action work, pleadings, disclosure, witness statements, and trial preparation.

Costs Management Conference:

During the CMC, the judge reviews the budgets and considers the proportionality of the proposed costs. After discussions, the judge reduces some of the projected costs for both parties, considering that certain aspects of the case do not require as extensive preparation as budgeted. The judge then issues a CMO setting out the approved budgets.

Outcome:

The CMO helps both parties manage their litigation expenses, providing a framework for cost control. As the case proceeds, the parties must adhere to their budgets unless they obtain court approval for significant deviations. This process ensures that the litigation remains cost-effective and proportionate to the dispute's value.

Key Considerations in Costs Management

Effective costs management requires attention to several important factors:

  • ★ Proportionality: Costs must be proportionate to the case's value, complexity, and importance. Courts will scrutinize costs that appear disproportionate, particularly in relation to the amount in dispute or the significance of the issues.
  • ★ Transparency and Accuracy: Costs budgets should be prepared transparently and accurately, providing a realistic estimate of the costs. Overstated or understated budgets can lead to problems in managing and recovering costs.
  • ★ Flexibility: While costs budgets set out an initial plan, they should be flexible enough to accommodate changes in the litigation's scope. Parties should promptly seek court approval for adjustments if unforeseen circumstances arise.
  • ★ Communication: Clear communication between the legal team and the client is crucial for managing expectations and ensuring that the client understands the costs involved. Regular updates on budgetary status and potential changes are essential.

Conclusion

Costs management and budgeting are vital tools in civil litigation, providing a structured approach to controlling legal costs and promoting efficient case management. By requiring parties to submit and adhere to costs budgets, the courts aim to prevent excessive and disproportionate expenditure, ensuring that litigation remains accessible and fair. Understanding the costs management process and its key considerations is essential for legal practitioners and litigants alike, helping to navigate the complexities of legal expenses in the pursuit of justice.

Costs Inter-partes costs orders (interim and final)
27

53

SQE2

Specification

Explore