On this page
Education Hub / SQE2 / Practice Areas/

Causation (single and multiple)

Topic

Causation in Tort Law: Single and Multiple Causes

Causation is a key element in tort law, establishing the link between a defendant's breach of duty and the harm suffered by the claimant. This concept is critical for determining liability and awarding damages. Causation can involve single or multiple causes, where a single act leads to harm or where several factors contribute to the damage. Understanding how causation is established ensures fair and accurate judgments in tort cases.

Single Cause

In cases of single causation, one defendant's act or omission is directly responsible for the harm:

  • ★ Factual Causation: The 'but-for' test is used to establish factual causation. This test asks whether the harm would have occurred 'but for' the defendant's actions. If the answer is no, the defendant's act is a factual cause of the harm.
  • ★ Legal Causation: Also known as proximate cause, legal causation considers whether the harm is sufficiently connected to the breach. The harm must be a direct and foreseeable result of the defendant's actions.
  • ★ Direct Link: A clear, direct link between the defendant's conduct and the claimant's harm is crucial. If the chain of causation is unbroken and the harm is a natural consequence of the breach, the defendant may be liable.

Multiple Causes

Multiple causation involves scenarios where several factors contribute to the harm. Determining liability in such cases can be complex:

  • ★ Concurrent Causes: When multiple acts or omissions by different parties independently cause the same harm, each can be liable if their conduct is a substantial factor in bringing about the injury. The 'material contribution' test is often used to establish causation.
  • ★ Consecutive Causes: This occurs when a series of events leads to harm. In such cases, it must be determined whether each event significantly contributed to the harm and if intervening acts break the chain of causation.
  • ★ Indivisible Injury: When harm results from the combined actions of multiple parties, and it is not possible to separate the damage caused by each, the parties may be held jointly and severally liable. This means each defendant can be responsible for the entire damage.
  • ★ Apportionment: In some cases, the court may apportion liability among the parties based on their relative contribution to the harm. This approach ensures a fair distribution of liability according to the degree of fault or causation.

Key Case Law

Single Cause - Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital Management Committee (1969)

In this case, the court applied the 'but-for' test to determine that the hospital's failure to treat the claimant did not cause his death, as the outcome would have been the same regardless of the breach. This case illustrates the necessity of establishing factual causation.

Multiple Causes - Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd (2002)

This case involved claimants exposed to asbestos by multiple employers, leading to mesothelioma. The House of Lords held that if each defendant's breach materially increased the risk of harm, they could be liable, illustrating the 'material contribution' test in cases of multiple causes.

Examples

Example 1 - Single Cause in Negligence

Scenario:

A driver negligently runs a red light, hitting a pedestrian. The pedestrian's injuries are directly caused by the driver's breach of duty. The 'but-for' test confirms that the injuries would not have occurred but for the driver's actions.

Example 2 - Multiple Causes in Environmental Harm

Scenario:

Several factories discharge pollutants into a river, resulting in significant ecological damage. Each factory's contribution to the pollution is a material factor in the overall harm. The court may hold each factory jointly and severally liable, as their combined actions led to the indivisible injury.

Conclusion

Causation is a crucial element in establishing liability in tort law. It ensures that only those responsible for the harm are held accountable. Whether dealing with single or multiple causes, the principles of factual and legal causation help delineate the scope of liability, ensuring fair outcomes in legal disputes. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately assessing negligence claims and ensuring justice for all parties involved.

Duty of care (standard (general and professional)) and breach Remoteness and loss
27

53

SQE2

Specification

Explore