Accomplices

Topic

Accomplices

Accomplices are individuals who assist, encourage, or facilitate the commission of a crime but do not directly carry out the criminal act. In criminal law, accomplices play a secondary role, providing support to the principal offender. Their involvement can occur before or during the crime, and they can be held criminally liable for their contributions to the offence.

Types of Accomplices

Accomplices can take various forms, depending on their level of involvement and the nature of their actions:

  • Abettors: These are individuals who encourage, instigate, or advise the principal offender to commit the crime. Abettors are typically present during the commission of the offence, offering moral support or encouragement.
  • Aiders: Aiders provide assistance to the principal offender, which can include supplying tools, information, or other means necessary for committing the crime. They may or may not be present at the crime scene.
  • Counsellors: Counsellors advise or plan the crime, offering guidance or strategic support. Their role is often preparatory, occurring before the offence is carried out.
  • Inciters: Inciters provoke or urge others to commit a crime, instigating the illegal act through their influence or persuasion.

Accomplices are legally accountable for their contributions to the crime, even if they did not physically participate in the actus reus. The level of liability often parallels that of the principal offender, meaning accomplices can be charged and convicted of the same offences as the principal. The extent of their culpability is determined by their intent (mens rea) and the nature of their assistance.

Case Law: R v Bainbridge [1960]

In *R v Bainbridge* [1960], the court held that an individual who provided the tools and information necessary for a bank robbery, without being present at the scene, could still be convicted as an accomplice. The court emphasized that knowledge of the specific crime and intent to assist in its commission were key to establishing liability.

Mens Rea and Accomplice Liability

To establish accomplice liability, the prosecution must prove that the accomplice had the requisite mens rea, which typically involves knowledge of the principal's criminal intent and an intention to assist in the commission of the crime. The accomplice must have knowingly and willingly contributed to the criminal act. Mere presence at the scene of a crime, without active participation or encouragement, is generally insufficient to establish liability as an accomplice.

Defences and Mitigating Factors

Accomplices may raise several defences to mitigate or negate their liability, including:

  • Withdrawal: An accomplice may escape liability if they withdraw their support for the crime and take steps to prevent it before it occurs. The withdrawal must be voluntary and complete.
  • Lack of Knowledge: If the accomplice was unaware of the principal's criminal intent or the nature of the crime, they may not be held liable.
  • Duress: An accomplice can claim duress if they were coerced into participating in the crime under threat of harm to themselves or others.

Conclusion

Accomplices play a critical role in the commission of crimes, providing support and assistance to principal offenders. While they do not directly commit the criminal act, their involvement and intent make them culpable under the law. The legal system treats accomplices seriously, often holding them to the same level of accountability as the principal offenders. Understanding the roles, responsibilities, and potential defences available to accomplices is crucial for accurately assessing their criminal liability and ensuring a fair judicial process.

SQE 2 Prep Course

Get Started