Rules Of Interpretation
The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty holds that Acts of Parliament are the supreme form of law.
However, since it is impossible for Parliament to anticipate every circumstance, courts interpret statutes and secondary legislation to address gaps and clarify intentions. This interpretation respects parliamentary sovereignty by adhering to established rules and principles.
For examination purposes, mastering the rules of statutory interpretation is crucial as they are central to understanding legal system studies.
1.1 Literal Rule
The Literal Rule mandates that clear statutory words be applied as written. Ambiguities are resolved by giving words their ordinary meaning, even if the result seems unreasonable.
"In a case concerning a regulation that prohibits "vehicles" in a park, a defendant argued that this did not apply to his motorbike since in local parlance, "vehicles" referred only to four-wheeled transports.
Applying the Literal Rule, the court may find that the ordinary meaning of "vehicle" encompasses the motorbike, thus upholding the regulation."
1.2 Golden Rule
When literal interpretation leads to an absurdity, the Golden Rule allows for an alternative meaning. It serves as a corrective to the Literal Rule.
"If a law mandates that "no animals shall be brought onto the premises," it would be absurd to include police dogs or guide dogs for the blind.
The Golden Rule would likely be invoked to interpret "animals" in a manner that excludes such working animals."
1.3 Mischief Rule
The Mischief Rule identifies the problem the statute intends to remedy and interprets the statute in a way that suppresses the mischief.
"A statute that prohibits "any form of electronic communication that interrupts a person's peace and quiet" could be applied to newer technologies such as drones with audio capabilities, even if they were not in existence when the law was passed, by using the Mischief Rule to interpret the statute's intention to cover all forms of intrusive electronic communication."
1.4 Purposive Rule
The Purposive Rule seeks the purpose behind a statute, considering the broader context and aims of the legislation, potentially looking at extrinsic materials.
"A law designed to curb "noise pollution from electronic devices" may be interpreted under the Purposive Rule to apply to modern devices that weren't available at the time the law was passed, like smart speakers, if such an interpretation aligns with the statute's intended purpose."
Rules Of Language Used In Interpretation
When interpreting statutes, judges consider the wording in the context of the entire statute, drawing on established linguistic rules and maxims to inform their decisions.
2.1 Expressio Unius est Exclusio Alterius
This legal principle suggests that the mention of one thing explicitly excludes others. If a statute specifies certain items, it implies that items not listed are not intended to be included.
"Consider the Sale of Goods Act, which stipulates particular conditions for the sale of commodities.
If the Act lists specific categories of goods but does not explicitly mention digital content, then, by the principle of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, digital content would be excluded from these provisions."
2.2 Noscitur a Sociis
Noscitur a sociis means that the meaning of a word can be derived from its association with surrounding words.
In statutory interpretation, this principle suggests that words grouped in a list should be given related meanings.
"In legislation concerning road traffic, the term 'vehicle' may be listed alongside 'cars', 'bicycles', and 'motorbikes'.
Under noscitur a sociis, 'vehicle' would be interpreted in the same context as these other forms of transport, indicating a land conveyance rather than, say, a boat or an aircraft."
2.3 In Pari Materia
In pari materia involves interpreting statutes that cover the same subject matter in a way that harmonises with each other, ensuring consistency across legal provisions.
"When interpreting a term like ‘parent' (in pari materia) in one Act, a judge may look to other Acts dealing with family law to find a consistent interpretation across all related statutes."
2.4 Ejusdem Generis
This rule is used when a list of specific items is followed by more general terms.
The general terms are then interpreted to cover only items similar to the specific ones listed.
"If a statute refers to 'lorries, vans, minibuses, and other vehicles', the term 'other vehicles' would likely be interpreted to mean vehicles similar to lorries, vans, and minibuses, such as other types of road vehicles, rather than, for instance, watercraft or aircraft."
Presumptions Used When Interpreting Law
In statutory interpretation, there are various presumptions that guide judges when the language is ambiguous:
- Presumption against a change in the common law.
- Presumption against ousting the jurisdiction of courts.
- Presumption of innocence in criminal statutes, where ambiguities are resolved in favour of the defendant.
- Presumption against retroactive application of statutes.
These presumptions, while influential, can be overridden by clear legislative intent.
Aids To Interpretation
When it comes to interpreting statutes, judges often refer to various aids to decipher the legislative intent.
These aids can be classified into two categories: intrinsic and extrinsic.
4.1 Intrinsic
Intrinsic aids are found within the statute itself and are considered the first line of inquiry in statutory interpretation, ensuring the judge's understanding aligns with Parliament's intention.
They are the elements of the statute that provide context to its provisions. The following are key intrinsic aids:
- Short Title. Offers a brief reference name of the Act.
- Long Title. Gives insight into the Act's purpose and scope.
- Preamble. Provides a statement of the statute's objectives and sometimes its reasoning.
- Marginal Notes. These notes can shed light on the sections' contents, although they are not part of the statute.
- Punctuation. Can influence the meaning of the provisions.
- Examples. When provided, they can clarify the application of a statute.
- Schedules. Contain detailed information and stipulations that supplement the main body of the statute.
These components are read together, giving the judiciary a comprehensive view of the statute's purpose and scope before resorting to any external sources of interpretation.
4.2 Extrinsic
When the intrinsic aids do not resolve ambiguities, judges may turn to extrinsic aids.
These are resources outside the statute that can help clarify uncertainties or provide additional context.
Key extrinsic aids include:
- Dictionaries. Utilised to define the ordinary or technical meaning of words.
- Explanatory Notes. Accompanying documents that explain the background and purpose of the statute.
- Hansard. The official report of the debates in Parliament, which may indicate the legislators' intentions.
- Previous Judicial Decisions. Prior case law can be influential, particularly where it has considered similar legislative provisions.
- Law Commission Reports. These may contain discussions that led to the legislation.
-
log in to verify your subscription status.
